Media focus on how the audience are going to perceive the news. they force the people to interpret what is going on around the world through their own framework. Lately BBC discuss trump’s wall issue. Many believe that the wall won’t prevent anything cause immigrates will find a way useless consume a lot of money others it will decrease the percentage of the illegal immigrates. But BBC’s video grab the attention of the negative part besides explaining the issue in a sarcastic manner.
First they show the confusion of trump’s decision. The hesitation of the walls material whether hardened concrete, see through and then slat steel . The unawareness of the total cost. These factors frame to the audience how was Trump wrong to take such a decision as if the audience where blind-folded they just agree to that. so, would you still be with Trump’s decision??
In fact media has a vital role in convincing you with it’s needs . The using of every single detail that obviously serves the meaning. The sequence of moving on from the inexact cost to the conflict of funding these tremendous costs embedded the impact of being against building that wall. Ending the video by “we are not doing a wall” which was said by Nancy Pelosi it definitely assures the idea that has been established through the video.
Focusing on just the negative part and framing the massive costs as the core of the video on the contrary BBC could talk about the percentage of preventing the immigrates won’t this change totally your opinion! .
esraa's blog 